Tippett leaves Berkeley and exposes the asset problem inside a VFX company

Tippett Studio continues taking work after its Berkeley facility exit. Knowledge, people and delivery now need reconnecting when stages, model shops and motion-control equipment no longer share one address.

United States / Canada3 min readAnalysis

The Los Angeles Times reported on 31 August that Tippett Studio is exiting its long-used Berkeley facility, with stages, models, equipment and other assets involved in liquidation. The same report quotes the company saying that visual-effects and animation work continues, the Toronto team remains active and stop motion has not disappeared from the service mix. On 2 September, the official site still listed Berkeley and Toronto offices and displayed 2026 work. The defensible finding is that the base is undergoing a major change while the company continues—not that the studio has ceased operating.

Official Tippett Studio production image of an artisan assembling a physical character model
Official Tippett Studio model-workshop production image.

One address contains three different kinds of asset

A VFX company leaving an office can often move compute, licenses and files into a new network. Tippett's Berkeley base carried another layer: physical models, motion-control systems, stages, tools and artisans familiar with all of them. Equipment can be inventoried, insured and transported; tacit coordination lives in working rhythm. Animation and short-drama clients therefore need to ask more than whether a team still exists. They need to know which shots require a stage, which equipment remains owned, which facilities will be hired externally, and whether the same physical setup can be reconstructed for revisions.

A workshop's value lies in both its inventory and the people who know how to make it work together again.
AniVerse editorial analysis
Capability map connecting a permanent base, external stages, the Toronto team and project delivery
Editorial visualAniVerse separates post-Berkeley delivery into space, equipment, people and version chains.AniVerse graphic based on public Tippett Studio and Los Angeles Times records

The procurement mistake is to treat brand history as current capacity. Tippett's credits establish deep creature, stop-motion and hybrid-craft experience, but they do not replace a current resource sheet. A producer should request named leads, execution locations, equipment ownership, backup for critical roles, asset-transport plans, data-security boundaries and milestone acceptance. If some shots move to outside stages, responsibility, insurance and revision windows belong in the contract. The purpose is not to dismiss craft; it is to align a historic reputation with present delivery conditions.

A network of outside facilities could also create flexibility, letting the company call stages and specialist capacity per project rather than carrying every fixed space. Whether the model works depends on delivery, retention of core artisans, access to physical assets and client tolerance for a more distributed chain of responsibility. The next evidence is not a single assurance of continuing business but changes in credits, hiring, suppliers and production locations across upcoming work.